ROB-GY 6013 · Mathematics for Robotics · Fall 2026
$\mathcal B=\{(1,1),(1,-1)\}$. What is $[y]_{\mathcal B}$ for $y=(6,0)$?
$[y]_{\mathcal B}=(3,3)^{\mathsf T}$
Check it forwards: $3(1,1)+3(1,-1)=(6,0)$. Or read it off: $B^{-1}(6,0)=\tfrac12(6,6)=(3,3)$.
Here $B=\begin{bmatrix}1&1\\1&-1\end{bmatrix}$, the matrix whose columns are the vectors of $\mathcal B$ (not the $B$ of problems 2, 3 and 5), and $B^{-1}=\tfrac12B$.
Two bases of $\mathbb R^2$: $B=\{(1,3)^{\mathsf T},(0,2)^{\mathsf T}\}$ and $C=\{(1,1)^{\mathsf T},(-1,1)^{\mathsf T}\}$. Build $P_{C\leftarrow B}$ by writing each $b_j$ in $C$. Do not invert anything.
Column $j$ is $b_j$ written in $C$. For $b_1=(1,3)^{\mathsf T}=\alpha(1,1)^{\mathsf T}+\beta(-1,1)^{\mathsf T}$, solve $\alpha-\beta=1$ and $\alpha+\beta=3$: $\alpha=2$, $\beta=1$. For $b_2=(0,2)^{\mathsf T}$: $\alpha=\beta=1$.
$$P_{C\leftarrow B}=\begin{bmatrix}2&1\\1&1\end{bmatrix}$$Same $B$ and $C$, and a third basis $D$ with $P_{D\leftarrow C}=\begin{bmatrix}1&0\\2&1\end{bmatrix}$. The product $P_{C\leftarrow B}\,P_{D\leftarrow C}$ is defined. Why is it not $P_{D\leftarrow B}$?
Line the labels up: $P_{C\leftarrow B}P_{D\leftarrow C}$ has $B$ meeting $D$ on the inside, and they do not match, so the product converts nothing. It is a perfectly good matrix, $\begin{bmatrix}4&1\\3&1\end{bmatrix}$, and it is not the one you want. The right order lets the two $C$'s meet: $P_{D\leftarrow B}=P_{D\leftarrow C}P_{C\leftarrow B}=\begin{bmatrix}2&1\\5&3\end{bmatrix}$. Square shapes will never warn you here; the inner labels are the check.
$[T]_{\mathcal B}=\begin{pmatrix}3&0\\0&1\end{pmatrix}$ with $\mathcal B=\{(1,1),(1,-1)\}$. What is $[T]_{\mathcal E}$?
$[T]_{\mathcal E}=\begin{pmatrix}2&1\\1&2\end{pmatrix}$
$$\begin{gathered}[x]_B=B^{-1}[x]_E\\[2pt][Tx]_B=[T]_B[x]_B\\[2pt][Tx]_E=B[Tx]_B\\[3pt]\boxed{[T]_E=B[T]_BB^{-1}}\end{gathered}$$The three lines: into $B$, act, back out; together they are the box.
With the same $B$ as in problem 1: $B[T]_{\mathcal B}B^{-1}=\begin{bmatrix}3&1\\3&-1\end{bmatrix}\cdot\tfrac12\begin{bmatrix}1&1\\1&-1\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}2&1\\1&2\end{bmatrix}$.
Back to the two bases of problems 2 and 3, with $P_{C\leftarrow B}=\begin{bmatrix}2&1\\1&1\end{bmatrix}$. A student holds $[x]_C=(3,1)^{\mathsf T}$ and wants $[x]_B$. They compute $P_{C\leftarrow B}\,[x]_C$ and write down $(7,4)^{\mathsf T}$. What is the right answer?
A $C$-column needs $P_{B\leftarrow C}=P_{C\leftarrow B}^{-1}$. Here $\det P_{C\leftarrow B}=2\cdot1-1\cdot1=1\neq0$, so the inverse exists; swap the diagonal entries and negate the other two:
$$[x]_B=\begin{bmatrix}1&-1\\-1&2\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}3\\1\end{bmatrix} =\begin{bmatrix}2\\-1\end{bmatrix}$$$R=\tfrac1{13}\begin{bmatrix}5&-12\\12&5\end{bmatrix}$ is a rotation. Through what angle $t$ does it turn? Read it off the first column.
$t=\arccos\tfrac5{13}\approx67.38^\circ$. The first column says where the first axis lands, so $\cos t=\tfrac5{13}$ and $\sin t=\tfrac{12}{13}$. Both are positive, so $t$ lies between $0^\circ$ and $90^\circ$. The sign of $\sin t$ is the step not to skip: $\arccos$ alone cannot tell a turn through $t$ from a turn through $-t$.
For a $2\times2$ matrix, $\det\begin{bmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{bmatrix}=ad-bc$. Which of these are in $SO(2)$? For each one that is not, name which of the two conditions it fails.
(a) A rotation. Each column against itself is $\tfrac{16}{25}+\tfrac{9}{25}=1$; the two columns against each other are $\tfrac{12}{25}-\tfrac{12}{25}=0$. So $Q_1^{\mathsf T}Q_1=I$, and $\det Q_1=\tfrac{16+9}{25}=1$.
(b) Not a rotation, though it passes $Q_2^{\mathsf T}Q_2=I$: its columns are unit and perpendicular. It fails $\det Q_2=1$, since $\det Q_2=\tfrac{3(-3)-4(4)}{25}=-1$.
(c) Not a rotation, and it fails the other condition: $\det Q_3=1$, but $Q_3^{\mathsf T}Q_3=\begin{bmatrix}4&0\\0&\tfrac14\end{bmatrix}\neq I$.
$R=\tfrac15\begin{bmatrix}3&-4\\4&3\end{bmatrix}$ and $x=(0,5)^{\mathsf T}$. Leave the arrow alone and turn the axes onto the columns of $R$. What is $[x]_R$?
$[x]_R=R^{\mathsf T}x=\tfrac15\bigl(3(0)+4(5),\;-4(0)+3(5)\bigr)^{\mathsf T}=(4,3)^{\mathsf T}$. The same point of the plane, with a new address.
This is the coordinate map $B^{-1}x$ of the first section, with the basis matrix now $R$; its inverse is free because $R^{\mathsf T}R=I$. The usual wrong turn is $Rx=(-4,3)^{\mathsf T}$: a different arrow, also of length $5$, read against the same axes as before.
Frames $a$, $b$, $c$ share one origin, with $x_a=R_{ab}x_b$ for $R_{ab}=\tfrac15\begin{bmatrix}3&-4\\4&3\end{bmatrix}$ and $x_b=R_{bc}x_c$ for $R_{bc}=\tfrac15\begin{bmatrix}4&-3\\3&4\end{bmatrix}$. A point reads $(2,1)^{\mathsf T}$ in frame $c$. What does it read in frame $a$?
$R_{ac}(2,1)^{\mathsf T}=(-1,2)^{\mathsf T}$, with
$$R_{ac}=R_{ab}R_{bc}=\tfrac1{25}\begin{bmatrix}12-12&-9-16\\16+9&-12+12\end{bmatrix} =\begin{bmatrix}0&-1\\1&0\end{bmatrix}.$$The labels do the bookkeeping: in $R_{ab}R_{bc}$ the inner $b$'s meet and vanish, leaving $a$ from $c$, and the right-hand factor acts first — on the $c$-column, which is what you were handed.
$Q=\begin{bmatrix}3/5&0\\4/5&0\\0&1\end{bmatrix}$, and $Q^{\mathsf T}Q=I_2$. Is $Q$ orthogonal?
No. Orthogonal means square with orthonormal columns, and $Q$ is $3\times2$; only a square matrix can have an inverse at all. $Q^{\mathsf T}$ undoes $Q$ from the left, not from the right:
$$QQ^{\mathsf T}=\begin{bmatrix}9/25&12/25&0\\12/25&16/25&0\\0&0&1\end{bmatrix}\neq I_3.$$$M=\begin{bmatrix}3&1\\2&-1\end{bmatrix}$. A triangle of area $2$ is carried over by $M$ — what is the area of its image?
$\det M=(3)(-1)-(1)(2)=-3-2=-5$.
One factor works for every region, so the image has area $|\det M|\cdot 2=5\cdot2=10$. area 10
The likely wrong turn is to report the area as $-10$: an area is never negative, and the minus sign in $\det M$ says only that $M$ turns the plane over.
Each of these is one glance, no elimination. Give the determinant and name the rule you used.
(a) Upper triangular, so the determinant is the product of the diagonal: $2\cdot3\cdot(-1)=-6$.
(b) Lower triangular. Its transpose is upper triangular with the same diagonal, and $\det L^{\mathsf T}=\det L$, so the same rule applies: $\det L=4\cdot(-2)\cdot0=0$.
$$K=\begin{bmatrix}2&1&0\\1&2&1\\0&1&2\end{bmatrix}\ \text{singular?}$$
$\det K=4$, so no.
Expanding along the first row:
$2(4-1)-1(2-0)+0=6-2=4$, so $Kx=b$ has exactly one solution for every $b$.
Or eliminate — subtracting a multiple of one row leaves $\det$ alone: $r_2-\tfrac12r_1$, then $r_3-\tfrac23r_2$, leaves pivots $2,\tfrac32,\tfrac43$, product $4$.
$A,B\in\mathbb R^{3\times3}$ with $\det A=3$ and $\det B=-2$. Give each of these, or say that it cannot be determined from what you were told.
(a) $\det(AB)=\det A\cdot\det B=-6$.
(b) $\det(A^{-1})=\tfrac13$. From $AA^{-1}=I$: $\det A\cdot\det(A^{-1})=\det I=1$.
(c) $\det(A^{\mathsf T}B^{2})=\det(A^{\mathsf T})\cdot(\det B)^{2}=3\cdot4=12$. Transposing changes nothing, and the square contributes its factor twice.
(d) Cannot be determined. Two pairs with the stated determinants:
For which $n$ does $\det(-A)=\det A$ hold for every $A\in\mathbb R^{n\times n}$?
Exactly the even $n$. The rule $\det(cA)=c^{n}\det A$ with $c=-1$ gives $\det(-A)=(-1)^{n}\det A$. For odd $n$ the two agree only in the one case $\det A=0$, which is not every $A$.
The likely wrong turn is $\det(-A)=-\det A$, as if the determinant were linear in the matrix; but $-A$ scales all $n$ directions of the box by $-1$, so that factor comes out $n$ times.
$A=\begin{bmatrix}0&2\\3&1\end{bmatrix}$. Which of $(2,3)^{\mathsf T}$, $(1,-1)^{\mathsf T}$, $(1,0)^{\mathsf T}$ are eigenvectors of $A$? Give the eigenvalue for each one that is.
Testing is one matrix–vector product each.
A negative eigenvalue is allowed: on $\operatorname{span}\{(1,-1)^{\mathsf T}\}$ the map is reversal through the origin together with a doubling.
What are the eigenvalues of $\begin{pmatrix}3&7\\0&5\end{pmatrix}$?
Write $A$ for this matrix; it is not the $A$ of problem 1.
3 and 5: $\det(A-\lambda I)=(3-\lambda)(5-\lambda)$, and a triangular determinant is the product of the diagonal.
For $\lambda=3$, $v=(1,0)$. For $\lambda=5$ it is $(7,2)$, not $(0,1)$: $(A-5I)(7,2)=(-14+14,\,0)=0$.
$B=\begin{bmatrix}4&1\\2&3\end{bmatrix}$ has eigenvalues $\lambda_1=5$ and $\lambda_2=2$. Find an eigenvector for each.
Each eigenspace is the null space $\operatorname{Null}(B-\lambda_i I)$. Since $\lambda_i$ is an eigenvalue, that matrix is singular, so one row must vanish.
$\lambda_1=5$: $B-5I=\begin{bmatrix}-1&1\\2&-2\end{bmatrix}\to\begin{bmatrix}-1&1\\0&0\end{bmatrix}$ by $r_2\to r_2+2r_1$: one pivot, one free. Read $-x_1+x_2=0$, so $v_1=(1,1)^{\mathsf T}$; check $Bv_1=(5,5)^{\mathsf T}=5v_1$.
$\lambda_2=2$: $B-2I=\begin{bmatrix}2&1\\2&1\end{bmatrix}\to\begin{bmatrix}2&1\\0&0\end{bmatrix}$ by $r_2\to r_2-r_1$: one pivot, one free. Read $2x_1+x_2=0$, so $v_2=(1,-2)^{\mathsf T}$; check $Bv_2=(2,-4)^{\mathsf T}=2v_2$.
$C\in\mathbb R^{2\times2}$ has $\operatorname{tr}C=5$ and $\det C=0$. What are its eigenvalues?
$\lambda_1=0$ and $\lambda_2=5$. The eigenvalues multiply to $\det C=0$, so one of them is $0$; they add to $\operatorname{tr}C=5$, so the other is $5$. The characteristic polynomial agrees: $\lambda^{2}-(\operatorname{tr}C)\lambda+\det C=\lambda^{2}-5\lambda=\lambda(\lambda-5)$.
$Q=\begin{bmatrix}0&-1\\1&0\end{bmatrix}$, the quarter turn. Solve $\det(Q-\lambda I)=0$.
$Q-\lambda I=\begin{bmatrix}-\lambda&-1\\1&-\lambda\end{bmatrix}$, so the main-diagonal product minus the anti-diagonal product is
$$\det(Q-\lambda I)=\lambda^{2}-(-1)(1)=\lambda^{2}+1=0$$$\Delta=0^{2}-4(1)(1)=-4<0$: no real root, so no real eigenvector. Over $\mathbb C$ the roots are $\lambda_{1,2}=\pm i$.
A $2\times2$ matrix $M$ has eigenvalues $\lambda_1=2$ and $\lambda_2=-1$, with eigenvectors $v_1=(2,1)^{\mathsf T}$ and $v_2=(1,1)^{\mathsf T}$. Building $M=V\Lambda V^{-1}$, a classmate lists the eigenvectors in the other order but leaves $\Lambda=\operatorname{diag}(2,-1)$ as it was. What do they get?
A different matrix. The swapped $V'=\begin{bmatrix}1&2\\1&1\end{bmatrix}$ has $\det V'=-1$, so
$$V'\Lambda=\begin{bmatrix}2&-2\\2&-1\end{bmatrix},\qquad V'\Lambda V'^{-1}=\begin{bmatrix}2&-2\\2&-1\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}-1&2\\1&-1\end{bmatrix} =\begin{bmatrix}-4&6\\-3&5\end{bmatrix}$$The right order gives $M=\begin{bmatrix}5&-6\\3&-4\end{bmatrix}$. Same two eigenvalues, but now $2$ belongs to $(1,1)^{\mathsf T}$ and $-1$ to $(2,1)^{\mathsf T}$. Reordering is allowed only if the columns of $V$ and the diagonal of $\Lambda$ move together.
$A=\begin{bmatrix}3&0\\1&2\end{bmatrix}$ has eigenvalues $\lambda_1=3$ and $\lambda_2=2$, with eigenvectors $v_1=(1,1)^{\mathsf T}$ and $v_2=(0,1)^{\mathsf T}$. Give $A^{k}$ in closed form.
$A^{k}=V\Lambda^{k}V^{-1}$, and $\Lambda^{k}$ raises each diagonal entry to the power $k$. With $V=\begin{bmatrix}1&0\\1&1\end{bmatrix}$ and $\det V=1$, $V^{-1}=\begin{bmatrix}1&0\\-1&1\end{bmatrix}$:
$$V\Lambda^{k}=\begin{bmatrix}3^{k}&0\\3^{k}&2^{k}\end{bmatrix},\qquad A^{k}=(V\Lambda^{k})V^{-1}=\begin{bmatrix}3^{k}&0\\3^{k}-2^{k}&2^{k}\end{bmatrix}$$At $k=2$ it gives $\begin{bmatrix}9&0\\5&4\end{bmatrix}$, and $A\cdot A$ gives the same: the $(2,1)$ entry is $1\cdot3+2\cdot1=5$.
A state evolves by $x_{k+1}=Ax_k$ with $A=\begin{bmatrix}0&2\\1&1\end{bmatrix}$ and $x_0=(4,1)^{\mathsf T}$; $A$ has eigenvalues $\lambda_1=2$ and $\lambda_2=-1$, with eigenvectors $v_1=(1,1)^{\mathsf T}$ and $v_2=(2,-1)^{\mathsf T}$. What does $x_k/2^{k}$ approach as $k\to\infty$?
It approaches $c_1v_1=2(1,1)^{\mathsf T}$. Split $x_0$ into modes: $c_1(1,1)+c_2(2,-1)=(4,1)$, and subtracting the two equations gives $3c_2=3$, so $c_2=1$ and $c_1=2$:
$$x_k=2\cdot2^{k}\begin{bmatrix}1\\1\end{bmatrix}+(-1)^{k}\begin{bmatrix}2\\-1\end{bmatrix},\qquad \frac{x_k}{2^{k}}=2\begin{bmatrix}1\\1\end{bmatrix}+\left(-\tfrac12\right)^{k}\begin{bmatrix}2\\-1\end{bmatrix}$$The second mode dies because $|\lambda_1|$ is strictly largest, and $c_1\neq0$ keeps the limit nonzero. The direction settles; $x_k$ itself keeps growing.
$x_{k+1}=Ax_k$ with $A=\begin{bmatrix}0&1\\ \tfrac{3}{10}&\tfrac{7}{10}\end{bmatrix}$. Does $x_k\to0$ for every $x_0$? Decide from the eigenvalues of $A$.
No. $\det(A-\lambda I)=\lambda^{2}-\tfrac{7}{10}\lambda-\tfrac{3}{10}$; times $10$, $10\lambda^{2}-7\lambda-3=(\lambda-1)(10\lambda+3)$, so $\lambda_1=1$ and $\lambda_2=-\tfrac{3}{10}$. They are distinct, so $A$ is diagonalizable, and $x_k\to0$ for every $x_0$ exactly when $\rho(A)<1$. Here $\rho(A)=1$, so $\rho(A)<1$ fails, and only just: the mode at $\lambda_1=1$ is multiplied by $1$ at every step and never dies.
One start that never decays: $x_0=(1,1)^{\mathsf T}$ gives $Ax_0=x_0$, so $x_k=x_0$ for every $k$.
Let $S=\begin{bmatrix}2&3\\0&2\end{bmatrix}$, a shear that also scales. Show there is no invertible $V$ and diagonal $\Lambda$ with $S=V\Lambda V^{-1}$.
From $SV=V\Lambda$, $S$ sends column $j$ of $V$ to $\lambda_j$ times itself, so the columns of the invertible $V$ would be a basis of eigenvectors of $S$. There is none: $\det(S-\lambda I)=(2-\lambda)^{2}$, and $S-2I=\begin{bmatrix}0&3\\0&0\end{bmatrix}$ forces the second entry to be $0$, so every eigenvector lies on the one line $\operatorname{span}\{(1,0)^{\mathsf T}\}$. No such $V$ exists, and $S$ is called defective.
The repeated root is not the fault: $2I$ repeats the eigenvalue $2$ and is already diagonal. What $S$ lacks is a second independent eigenvector.
Symbols, shapes and the two sign conventions: Notation and Conventions. What each source is for, and where its notation differs from ours: Textbooks and Reading Guide.